la hipocrisia del feminismo y su manipulation na sociedad

Currently, we took knowledge of the feminist deputies in the European parliament that want to manipulate the merit and equality against men, especially whit the Sweden feminist presidency of Europe and many influences in the council of Europe .

Is intellectual manipulation and violence form the feminist deputies that want to put women in power, just because they are women, even without having the status, merit, knowledge’s, social status, impartiality of gender ideologies specially feminist (that the majority of women in not), economic and scientific status and Further factors of psychological profile and intellectual and ethic profile .

If feminist in politics and society always assault men to coerce their rights and liberties, merits and power, and always try to put women superior to men, discriminating them positively without give and be humanist and give the same rights for equality and positive discrimination for men, specially in those issues that men is losing and affect.

Currently, men cannot live whit women, cannot establish relationships and it would increase the feminist hypocrisy whit the time, if is not blamed, arrested, accused those criminal feminist that manipulates traffic of influences, discrimination against men and positive discrimination to women.

They are going against the constitutionality, human right and humanism, and also against the nature and naturals laws of evolutionism.

Please block and lawsuit those feminist, coerce the political access, even if they are not radicals, androphobics, psychotics, obsessive lesbians that usually are radical feminists.

In every developed and wealth society, the knowledge’s and the intellectual is a main domain for development, competence and rigor. If the none study and get a academic or instructional degree they are suppose by logic, to don’t have the intellectual knowledge’s enough to execute a profession or to have experience of that. Many professions needs a good intellectual preparation and almost scientifically, even not only those hard sciences as natural sciences, but also some human sciences, so if the person has a low degree should be lower in status than a master degree or higher as a professor or post-PhD scientist, as by logic and not by left political ideologies.

However, the feminists philosophers manipulates that, and try whit many thesis to use a kind of sensitive and intellectual violence to coerce the intellectual status and merit when they are losing, specially when it is men the negative affected or by mainstreaming, they avoid or coerce to give men the same positive discrimination and try to exclude all the justifications for that, in a manipulating philosophical way try to convince the men and society that they are right.

When women is privileged and under positive discrimination, men is exploited and under negative discrimination, when is merit the discrimination independent the sex, women is defended as coerced, but they don’t mention what they earn positively without.

In fact, options are made by those men and females, and the feminists want to obligate the women and men take their options and be forced by them, as you can see, they don’t say that when taking one option we cannot take more than curtains, so for the feminists is all or nothing, taking all the arguments to defend them but coercing the arguments to defend men or is men or andro-humanist rights association defend them.

Men continue to be always coerced to have exclusives/mainstreaming/reciprocals positives discriminations and justifiability for their positive discrimination, if they demand de positive discrimination the feminist would manipulate to be seen as wreakers, losers, inutile and incompetents, but however they don’t accept if done to women…men is ignored as inexistent or lower human being.

There’s no reciprocity right, no homologation right or positive discrimination and those all stuffs is anti-intellectual, anti-humanist, anti-natural and sadist.

Currently, they are many intellectuals and higher professions corrupted by feminism, almost in everything even religion and nature, the females intellectuals became and are feminists and corrupted anti-human especially anti-men rights and reciprocity and homologation of equality of the positive discriminations made for women.

The feminist argument s has become valid because are well conspired and study by the feminists, formed in feminist sciences and another human sciences (artificial sciences), that they make almost very well than can persuade the society, specially the parliaments, courts and hypocrite scientific studies.

Men don’t have a science of his studies, as andro-sciences as machismo is blamed by the feminists, even if hypocritally and worst than machismo, however even the humanist sciences are corrupted by feminism (because majority is women study and teaching) and the human rights is not focus to male problems and advantages in society but just specific for women and Childs only (men out), so it is needed that in many ways when justice is corrupted, even the higher courts, as low probability as the lowers courts, that the men procedure is needed and efficient is to make justice by themselves and even crimes and terrorism.

The females demand liberty but coerce the same right for men special in the dressing and esthetics, in special to homologate the mini skirt for men and many others clothes elements.

The sexy clothes and mini-skirts are sexual stimulants not for heterosexual men but also for feminist and should not be right for public places, as by logic.

The feminist is not a wiser and logic way for humanity and hypocrisy for the destruction of the humanity, specially men and men’s rights.

If a men sign the feminism he’s incoherent and or paradox with them-self’s, his offending his human rights and promotion his own negative discrimination if he have problems whit women or become victim or accused, specially if doesn’t change of sex, so anyone that approves and consider feminism as humanist it would be hypocrite whit themselves. If a men is accepting feminism or he’s subjected and threats and violence in many several ways, or his week psychologically, or his extremely dependent of those females and don’t want to loose them, even if mothers or relatives and even if feminist and making discrimination and violence against him if he doesn’t support their interests.

Many men are conformists because they cannot support to make front and war against feminist and become victim or revenges invisible or visible form feminist and females, without respect of ethics special sexual ethics whit adverse gender and humanism.

Best regards.

Thank you.

VIAMREC
VIRTUAL INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MEN’S RIGHTS AND EQUALITY CONDITION

Un saludo también para ti.

Antonio García, presidente de la Asociación de Hombres por la Igualdad de Género, acuña éste término para el comportamiento de los jóvenes entre 17 y 30 años, que aunque perfumados y depilados, en…